|
RESPONSE TO SOUTHERN HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES
BOARD DRAFT EQUALITY SCHEME
SCOPE AND REMIT
This response has been completed on behalf of The
Children's Law Centre and will focus specifically on the Board's
implementation of the statutory equality duty in the context
of children and young people. These comments should however
be read in the context of the other equality duties which
will also apply to children and young people, e.g. children
with a disability and children without, children of different
religious beliefs, sex, race, sexual orientation or young
people with dependants and without.
GENERAL COMMENTS
In relation to both consultation and equality of opportunity
in respect of children and young people we believe that this
legislation offers many opportunities and challenges for better
government. We believe that if properly implemented it should
result in children's issues being much more visible in government
and specifically in the work of the Board, which takes a lead
role in many aspects of policy and practice affecting children
and young people.
We trust that the Board will implement the proposed
amendments to their scheme which we have outlined in this
response to ensure their scheme is fully compatible with the
legislative requirements and guidelines in respect of promoting
equality of opportunity between persons of different ages
which as outlined in the guidelines refers to young as well
as old.
FUNCTIONS AND POLICIES OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY
There is a lack of clarity in relation to the specific
functions, duties and powers of the Board and the draft plan
refers consistently to the carrying out of functions and duties
(Para 2.3) when in fact the Draft Guidance makes it clear
at Section 2.10 that functions includes powers and duties
and that the phrase carrying out embraces a wide range of
activity. It would be helpful if the Board provided a clear
statement outlining its functions, duties and powers and explaining
the interaction with the DHSS PS and Trusts in a clearer manner.
It is also essential that the Board outlines the steps
that will be taken to ensure that the statutory duty will
be met by the Trusts. We are concerned that unless this matter
is specifically addressed in the scheme that responsibility
for ensuring equality of opportunity for children's services
will be passed from one agency to another specifically in
relation to the allocation of resources to Trusts.
We would expect to see a clear statement in the
Scheme to clarify the interaction between Boards and Trusts
and DHSS PS.
ORGANISATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
It is essential that one point of contact is identified
for complaints. We question the appropriateness of using the
same administrative arrangements which are used presently
for the Board's complaints procedures as this could lead inevitably
to confusion. Whilst we acknowledge that you have addressed
this issue at Section4.5 of your scheme, a separate system
should be set up particularly as a clear link will have to
be established between letters of complaint to the Board and
the complaints procedure set out at Appendix 2 section 10
of the guidelines. Nomination of a specific complaints officer
is noted and welcomed.
CONSULTATION
There is an absence of a commitment to consultation
with children and young people at Section 4.3. We suggest
that this section should be expanded to take into account
fully the guiding principles at page 33 of the Equality Commission's
Guidelines, by making specific reference to a commitment to
provide information in a way which is accessible in terms
of language, format, times and venues of meetings.
This section in our view will not be compliant with
guidelines in its present form as not enough detail is given
about proposed consultees or consultation procedures. Specific
reference should be made in your scheme must include a commitment
to:
1. Consultation with groups and individuals
as soon as possible.
2. Methods of consultation including
a commitment to give consideration to face to face meetings,
small group meetings, focus groups, discussion papers etc.
3. Ensuring that language and format
are accessible with specific consideration as to how to communicate
information to young people.
4. Provision for training.
5. A commitment to giving adequate
time for responses.
These matters must all be clearly addressed within
your scheme for it to be compliant with the legislation and
Guidance. Consultation is required with those affected by
your policies. A clear commitment to consultation with children
and young people should be included in the Board's scheme.
POLICY SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT
We note that the Board has not yet concluded its policy
screening exercise and that it is intended that a detailed
report on this exercise will be submitted to The Equality
Commission. A commitment is required under the Guidelines
at page 37 to consultation with those affected by your policies
as part of this procedure, publication of the outcome of this
consultation procedure and to providing a detailed breakdown
of all policies which will be subject to impact assessment
and also all those which will not with reasons. These matters
should all be covered in your Scheme. Details of consultees
should also be included. There must be a commitment to consultation
with children and young people in this regard.
In relation to proposed policies again arrangements
should be specified in relation to proposed consultation arrangements
with specific reference to children and young people in the
context of impact assessments.
What is the timescale for the screening exercise to
take place? What efforts are currently being made to collect
and analyse relevant information and data at present which
will inform the screening process?
IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
We note the reference to influence of Departmental
policy on your timescales for impact assessment and advise
that we have already expressed alarm in our response to the
Draft DHSS and PS Scheme in relation to the priorities afforded
to children and young people .It has been indicated that equality
impact assessments in relation to personal social services
for children and young people will not take place until Year
5 which is totally unacceptable and shows a poor commitment
to children's rights enshrined in the UN Convention On The
Rights Of The Child. This situation must be addressed as a
matter of urgency.
We object to the imposition of a charge for information
in relation to impact assessments as we believe that this
will be a barrier to accessibility and is not provided for
in the Guidelines (see specifically 4.4 Guidelines).
PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION
We welcome the recognition of the particular needs
of children and young people in accessing information at Section
7.1 but we would welcome a statement in accordance with Section
4(2) c of the Guidance confirming the manner in which the
information w ill be made accessible, i.e. will the Board
produce young people's summaries of the policies and proposed
policies which are subject to impact assessment?
CONCLUSION
There is an absence in the Board's scheme of a clear
commitment to consult with children and young people in relation
to policies or proposed policies or during impact assessments.
This may be an oversight as certainly other Boards have recognised
the need to consult with children and young people. We do
not believe the Board's Scheme at present complies with Guidance
and trust that the amendments we have suggested will be incorporated
to ensure legislative compliance and the recognition of children's
rights.
Paddy Kelly, Director, Children's Law Centre
|