home » members » proposal for a childrens leaving care bill Members
UNCRC and other international human rights standards
 


SUBMISSION BY THE CHILDREN’S LAW CENTRE

PROPOSALS FOR A CHILDREN LEAVING CARE BILL

INTRODUCTION

The Children’s Law Centre is an independent charity established in September 1997 founded on the United Nations Convention On The Rights Of the Child. We provide training, information, research, advice and representation on domestic and international laws affecting children and young people. We often advise young people who are looked after and leaving care and we are therefore aware of the complexity of many of the difficulties faced by young people. Thank you for affording us the opportunity to comment on these proposals.

We broadly welcome the proposals for a Children Leaving Care Bill, which will provide the opportunity for debate on this important issue.

The proposals are at this stage broadly defined and, particularly in relation to benefits entitlement, we would welcome sight of detailed proposals in this regard to enable us to forward detailed comments.

We suggest that it will be necessary for the Department of Health, Social Services & Public Safety to consult further about the detailed implementation of these proposals so that any legislative change will provide a specific remedy for the difficulties encountered by young people leaving care at present in N Ireland. This will involve consultation with leading organisations in this area such as First Key (NI) who have carried out a considerable amount of research about young people leaving care. Consultation should also be conducted with aftercare teams and with children and young people themselves on the contents of the proposals. It would be useful to produce a young person’s summary of the document and for future consultation exercises.

THE PROPOSALS

Our view is that Article 35 of the Children (NI) Order1995 is too discretionary at present. The weaknesses are as follows;

DUTY TO ASSESS AND MEET NEEDS

Article 35 only refers to advising, assisting and befriending. We agree with the proposal in the consultation document that there should in fact be a duty to assess and meet the needs of each individual young person leaving care.

DUTY TO APPLY TO ALL CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE LEAVING CARE

The duty to advise and befriend should apply to all children and young people leaving care. The Children (NI) Order 1995 makes a distinction at present between different categories of young people leaving care. Those who have been looked after by a Trust or accommodated on behalf of a voluntary organisation are owed a duty by the Trust in terms of advice and assistance. The Trusts retain discretion in relation to the provision of such a service to young people who have been accommodated in a children’s home, privately fostered or accommodated for a consecutive period of at least three months in Education & Library Board accommodation, residential care home, hospital, nursing home or any prescribed accommodation.

We recommend that the new duty to assess and meet needs should apply to all of the above young people and that any discretionary element should be removed. We recommend detailed consultation in relation to the regulations, which will be drafted in relation to “eligible children” and prescribed periods. There is no detail in the consultation paper about eligibility criteria and it will be essential that consultees are given the opportunity to address the detail required for Regulation at a later stage in this process.

RESOURCES

We are extremely concerned by the comment on page 11 of the consultation document, which reads as follows;

“ Under the new arrangements existing spending on aftercare services and benefits would be drawn together and used by Trusts to provide support and assistance”

The issue of additional resources must be addressed as a matter of urgency before this Bill is enacted. The purpose behind this Bill should be to improve the lives of young people leaving care. We need to acknowledge that despite some excellent work being carried out by leaving and aftercare teams and voluntary organisations in N Ireland that the reality is that services in this area are under funded. Research in N Ireland has shown that young people are leaving care too young, they are leaving with lower educational attainment, they often experience periods of homelessness and they often live in poverty or on a very limited income. [1]There needs to be an open acknowledgement that the reason we need further legislation is because in the past not enough has been spent on our care leavers.

“ Adding the money currently spent together will not produce the better outcomes we are looking for”[2]

We note that in England the introduction of a similar Bill was supported by new funding from the Children’s Social Services Special Grant, which was set up by Local Authorities as part of The Quality Protects Programme.

It is our view that in order for the proposals in this Bill to be effective, there must be additional funds allocated to support its implementation. We are concerned that a simple amalgamation of budgets will lead to care leavers in fact being financially worse off than they are at present.

EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE

The Trust needs to retain the power to help young people in an emergency.

PATHWAY PLANS

We support the introduction of a statutory requirement to provide a pathway plan for each young person leaving care. We suggest that again there needs to be detailed consultation about Regulations in relation to assessments carried out for a pathway plan and in relation to mandatory contents of a pathway plan. For example, we would suggest that Regulation or Guidance in this regard makes specific reference to consultation with the young person about the Pathway Plan. The Regulations should also require that discussion about pathway plans with young people begin at least a year before the child/young person is due to leave school to allow for input from school and the education sector.

We recommend that it should be a duty on Trusts to prepare and review pathway plans for all young people leaving care and that the duty to review should last until the young person is 21, or 24 where the young person is continuing in education.

YOUNG PERSONS ADVISERS

The task of the young person’s adviser appears to be a very onerous one. We understand the position to be that leaving and aftercare teams throughout N Ireland currently support children and young people leaving care on limited budgets and that in fact aftercare services are increasingly being provided by the voluntary sector.

We therefore need to know whether substantial significant funding will be provided to implement young persons advisers.

We note that the young person’s adviser has the task of negotiating an agreed pathway plan for the young person. Is the YPA totally independent of social services? We note from the original consultation document in England, Me, Survive, Out There? that there was a proposal for an Independent Review Tribunal which could fast track complaints in relation to pathway plans. As we all know, agreement is not always possible and in our view the role and remit of the YPA needs to be very carefully defined. There also needs to be a clear method of redress for a young person if agreement cannot be reached, for example if the young person chooses to go to a college which is a further distance than the local college and the Trust will not pay the bus fares or the young person has identified property, which is perhaps slightly more expensive than usual, but is in an area where the young person will be close to relatives etc.

Young people who are going into care are entitled to a Guardian Ad Litem and a solicitor to represent them. Surely young people leaving care should be entitled to separate representation if a disagreement arises also? We would recommend that the YPA has a role to advocate on behalf of the young person and to advise the young person to contact a solicitor should matters not be agreed. We endorse the comments made by The National Deaf Youth Association in relation to the support of deaf young people leaving care.

THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD

The bill should reflect the need for assessment and planning to be carried out in a manner, which is in the child’s best interests and not driven by financial considerations.

ACCOMMODATION

We note from the Northern Ireland Leaving Care Factsheet prepared by First Key NI recently that whilst a few Trusts have semi independent flats linked with children’s residential homes, voluntary organisations are the only providers of specialist leaving and aftercare accommodation (most of which is in the Eastern Board area.)

It is essential that this Bill requires Trusts to provide suitable accommodation for care leavers. Suitable accommodation is not bed and breakfast accommodation or hostel accommodation for homeless people. There are specific issues in relation to what constitutes suitable accommodation for young single mothers or for young people with mental health difficulties.

The issue of accommodation is not dealt with in the consultation document in any detail. In our view there needs to be specific regulation and a specific legal duty to provide suitable accommodation and “suitable accommodation” needs to be defined. We would urge the Department to consult about this important issue with a view to drafting a specific clause and accompanying Regulations to remedy this situation.

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

At present the provision of financial assistance to care leavers is discretionary under The Children (NI) Order 1995 and unfortunately there is no regionally agreed protocol in relation to the amounts payable to young people for setting up home or for travel expenses/ educational expenses. The current Bill needs to address these difficulties. We would welcome further clarification in relation to the amounts of money payable to care leavers under the new system. The amounts set will have to recognise that young care leavers need help with furnishing their homes, education, clothes, socialising, sports, hobbies etc as well as assistance with day-to-day living costs.

We recommend that the power to provide financial assistance should be amended to become a duty. Further discussion and information needs to be provided about the amount of financial assistance, which will be available. We are interested in looking in detail at the interaction between the social security system and the Trusts and perhaps further details could be sent to us in due course in this regard.


EDUCATION

1 It is essential that Guidance is developed in relation to the education of children in the care system and that personal education plans are used to ensure that children in the care system whether in foster or residential placements .We commend the efforts of The Northern Board in this regard. It is essential that issues such as suspension, exclusion and special educational needs are addressed as part of these detailed plans and in the overall pathway plan.

2 There should be a legal duty on Trusts to assist with costs associated with a young person’s education up until they are 24. This should include the payment for books and for “out of term time” accommodation (young person should be able to receive the payment themselves and choose accommodation).

3 It is important that care leavers have access to careers advice and guidance and the plans for accessing guidance should be incorporated into the requirements for the leaving care plan.

4 There needs to be some flexibility in the eligibility criteria to provide financial assistance to young people who have left care, but who do not immediately go into further education. Where there has been a break, the young person will need financial assistance at an older age to continue with education and this needs to be provided for.


CONCLUSION

We would ask the Department to forward these proposals again to us in further detail once this initial consultation exercise has been completed.

Whilst we generally welcome these developments we are of the view that we need to see the proposed legislative changes in draft and proposed Regulation and Guidance in detail before we could comment further.

There are two major issues, which concern us at this time.

Firstly the proposals implemented in England in The Children (Leaving Care Act) 2000 were part of the wider initiative of Quality Protects and the legislation attracted considerable additional funds for implementation. Children leaving care was identified as one of the six priorities for use of the £375 million allocated under The Children’s Social Services Special Grant. It has been indicated in the proposals For A Children Leaving Care Bill in this jurisdiction that budgets will be joined together, which suggests that there will be no additional monies allocated. It is impossible to see how the legislative amendments proposed could possibly be nil cost. In our view many of the proposed services should be in addition to the work of the leaving and aftercare teams already in existence.

Secondly, The Quality Protects Programme in England covers both children looked after and children in need generally and as part of this initiative an assessment framework has recently been introduced as a mandatory requirement in England. We are not suggesting that it is necessary to duplicate the entirety of Quality Protects, but we certainly see the need for research to be carried out as to how to implement a similar initiative in N Ireland.

It is difficult for us to address the issue of children and young people leaving care in the absence of a wider framework. There are serious related issues in relation to the lack of provision of residential care, the implementation of Children Matter, the difficulties associated with accessing special educational needs services and mental health services for children and young people in care, the low educational attainment of many children in care, which all need to be addressed in the same context as this current Bill if real progress is to be made.

In future it would be helpful if policy initiatives for children could be set in the context of the Assembly’s wider strategic framework for improving the lives of our children and young people.

We thank you for affording us the opportunity to comment at this stage and we would welcome being involved in discussion in relation to the detailed proposals for the Bill and for associated Regulations and Guidance.

Tara Caul
Children’s Law Centre
3rd Floor
Philip House
123-137 York Street
Belfast
BT15 1AB

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Meeting the Challenge; 1996;Pinkerton, J and Mc Crea, R

[2] P 26 Me, Survive, Out There? Department of Health.


This web page has been prepared by and is the sole copyright of Childrenslawcentre (C) 1999. All rights reserved.